Do you really want the sale of liquor including beer and wine in our city and county?  I don’t and therefore I will be voting to keep our county “dry.”  Don’t let others sell you “a pig in a poke.”

I admit that voting Clark County wet is not the be all and end all answer to growth, but it would go a long way in breaking the backward and non-progressive thinking that has held Clark County back for so many years.

I have made a contribution in your honor to the Clark County Democratic Party that so quickly and cheerfully replaced the stolen signs.

With Obama’s background, associations, philosophy and practices, when you vote for him, you are not voting for him, you are voting for the first major step toward socialistic governmental control over you and your family’s lives from kindergarten to the voting booth (thanks to ACORN) to the grave.

I feel a responsibility to these petition signers that this issue is voted on and that their votes count.

Go vote and make the decision by the ballot box, in what I consider, this vital lifestyle and economic decision.

If the evidence submitted to the court, questioning signatures on the petition for the vote on the wet/dry issue, is accurate, I have but one question. Was the democratic process jeopardized by false information or improperly dated petitions?

Speaking for myself ... Clark County should stay “dry” and follow the successful examples of Conway, Russellville, Batesville, Jonesboro and other cities and counties that remain dry but are utilizing the private-club laws that have been available for years.

First, is the kingdom of God a present reality or a future expectation? Second, is the kingdom of God primarily a theological power forced onto a passive world by God, or is it an ethical charge to humans to participate in the coming of God’s rule through discipleship?

The address is still the same — www.siftingsherald.com — but the style and organization is different. Much, much different.